- About us
- About colleges
-
Corporate services
- Corporate services
- Mental health and wellbeing
- Data Protection/GDPR
-
Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment: How we support members
- Introduction & Employment Helpline
- Absence & Sickness Management
- Contracts and T&Cs
- Disciplinary, Capability & Grievance
- Employment Briefings Library
- Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
- General Employee Relations & HR Issues
- Holiday/annual leave related
- Industrial Relations
- ONS reclassification related guidance
- Pay & Pensions
- Recruitment
- Redundancy, Restructuring & TUPE
- Safeguarding/Prevent
- Workforce Benchmarking, Surveys & Research
-
Governance
- Governance
- Governance: How we support members
- Governance Timeline
- Representation
- AoC National Chairs' Council
- National Governance Professionals' Group
- Code of Good Governance
- External Governance Reviews
- Resources
- Governors Inductions
- Student Governor Inductions
- Student Governor Support Hub
- Guidance
- Hot Topics
- Governance Briefings
- Archive
-
Projects
- Projects
- Get Involved!
- Resources
- Contact the Projects Team
- Apprenticeship Workforce Development (AWD) Programme
- Creating a Greener London – Sustainable Construction Skills
- The 5Rs Approach to GCSE Maths Resits
- Creative Arts in FE 2024 – developing student voice through creativity
- DfE Multiply Capability Support Programme
- Digital Roles Across Non-digital Industries
- GCSE Resits Hub Project
- Pears Foundation Youth Social Action Programme: Phase 2
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Provider Support Programme
- T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Offer
- The Valuing Enrichment Project
- Creative Writing in FE Anthology 2021/2022
- Resources/Guidance
- Sustainability & Climate Action Hub
- Partnerships
- Honours Nomination
- Brexit
- Ofsted Inspection Support
- Recruitment and consultancy
-
Events and training
- Events and training
- Events
- AoC Annual Conference and Exhibition 2024
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Events
- Events and training: How we support members
- Network Meetings
- Previous Events and Webinars
- In-House Training
- Senior Leadership Development Programme
- Introducing AoC's Early Career and Experienced Managers' Programme
- Sponsorship and Exhibition Opportunities
- Funding and finance
-
Policy
- Policy
- Meet the Policy Team
- Policy: How we support members
- Policy Areas
- Policy Briefings
- Submissions
- Policy Papers & Reports
- AoC Strategy Groups
-
AoC Reference Groups
- AoC Reference Groups
- 14-16 Reference Group
- 16-18 Reference Group
- Adults (inc. ESOL) Reference Group
- Apprenticeship Reference Group
- EDI Reference Group
- HE Reference Group
- HR Reference Group
- International Reference Group
- Mental Health Reference Group
- SEND Reference Group
- Sustainability & Climate Change Reference Group
- Technology Reference Group
- WorldSkills Reference Group
- Opportunity England
-
Research unit
- Research unit
- Surveys
- MiDES Benchmarking
- Research Further
-
Research projects
- Research projects
- Investigating the impact of the apprenticeship levy on training outcomes - January 2024
- Forecasting the cost of the English HE funding system - November 2023
- Local skills improvement plans: a review of their impact and opportunities for the future
- The educational provision for 14 to 16-year-olds in further education in England
- Staying with the troublemakers: A celebration of research in FE
- Strengthening governance arrangements in the English post-16 skills system
- Data Sources
- Think Further - thought leadership in FE
-
News, campaigns and parliament
- News, campaigns and parliament
- Post-election hub
- General and mayoral election resources
-
Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Media relations: 10 ways to build effective relationships with the media
- How to choose a PR agency
- Legal considerations for communications and media work
- How to plan for a new build
- Crisis communications: your go-to guide
- How to handle photo consent for media and marketing
- How to evaluate a PR and media campaign
- How to react to regulation, funding and restructuring issues
- How to react quickly and effectively to the media
- Working with the media: a complete guide
- How to write a compelling case study
- How to write for the web
- College communications, marketing and campaigns community
- AoC Newsroom
- AoC Blogs
- Work in Parliament
- AoC Campaigns
- Briefings
- Communications, media, marketing and research: How we support members
-
Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion blogs
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter for further education sector organisations
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter signatories
- Diversity in Leadership
- Black FE Leadership Group and AoC partnership agreement
- AoC's Equity Exchange
- Equality, diversity and inclusion: how we support members
- Equality, diversity and inclusion case studies
- ETF Inclusive Leadership Coaching Programme
- Equality, diversity and inclusion briefings
- Home
- News, campaigns and parliament
- AoC Blogs
- Why it’s time to ditch curriculum intent statements
Why it’s time to ditch curriculum intent statements
Curriculum intent statements are all the rage now. While I don’t have a problem with a course having a clear purpose and rationale, I am curious about the justification for some of the curriculum intent statements I read, and I do question whether they are a good use of time for hard-pressed teachers.
So, what’s wrong with intent statements?
Frankly, they are frequently little more than a superficial statement of the obvious. Many that I read state that the curriculum is ambitious and aims to teach students what they need to progress to their desired destinations. They often say that students will develop their personal skills and some also talk about being responsive to industry and employers’ needs. I know that may seem a bit reductive but honestly, a lot don’t go beyond that.
I am really not sure what reader is going to find such a statement useful. All it does is raise questions. What content makes this curriculum ambitious? What will students learn that will make them a good candidate for a job or higher level course? What are they going to be taught that develops personal skills and characteristics such as resilience, self-confidence and values? How will their progress be assessed?
I know that many leaders have Ofsted inspectors in mind when they ask teachers to write an intent statement, but in reality, inspectors should not ask for them. In a 2019 blog Heather Fearn, Ofsted’s curriculum lead, said: “There’s no need to write new statements, adapt websites or restructure staffing to cover intent”. Ofsted inspections are stressful enough without producing paperwork that adds little value to students and is not required by inspectors. Inspectors have plenty of ways of finding out about intent without reading intent statements.
I think it’s more valuable to think about what curriculum intent actually is. I spend quite a bit of time training teachers and managers on the principles of effective curricula. At some point during the day we usually discuss intent, implementation and impact. When we talk about intent, everyone talks about intended destinations, but I also encourage them to talk about the content of the course that prepares students for those destinations.
Content is the very essence of intent. Ofsted’s first bullet about intent in the inspection handbook (before the Education Inspection Framework no-one had heard of ‘intent’ so it is right that we refer to the handbook) states that “inspectors will explore how leaders have ensured that a subject curriculum includes content that has been identified as most useful…”
Now that’s a valuable thing to talk about. If leaders check that the content of a course is useful, it implies they are asking incisive questions about employer links, teachers’ knowledge and expertise, the students’ prior learning, resources and job outcomes, and progression of previous students – all of which should inform the content of a curriculum.
The bullet goes on to talk about whether the teaching enables students to “acquire the intended knowledge, skills and behaviours”, which again focuses on content. So, this means leaders need to make sure their teachers have the planning skills to construct a curriculum around these. Leaders should also establish a culture in which planning and teaching go beyond a syllabus. This leads to curricula that include the personal skills students need to develop, incorporate the expectations of a specific industry and teach all the other content that makes an ambitious, exciting and valuable programme of study.
In short, intent is everything that informs the content of a curriculum. To express so much in a short statement is not possible, so it’s not surprising that many of these statements are superficial and of little value to any reader.
Intent is not new. It’s the latest manifestation of an enduring principle: a course must be planned using subject and pedagogical knowledge, research, insight and creativity. Truly ambitious organisations, that are confident in their curriculum planning and evaluation, know this. Organisations that are not yet confident in their curriculum planning skills would do well to focus on developing these and recognise intent statements as the distraction that they are.
So don’t write woolly statements of curriculum intent. Always think of content when you consider intent and remember, a buzzword is no substitute for high quality curriculum planning.
Steven Tucker was a full-time further education inspector in Ofsted for 10 years. During this time, he held national lead posts for curriculum and 16 to 19 programmes and led the training of HMI and Ofsted inspectors in the FE sector.
Steven is leading the AoC Ofsted College and Skills Nominee Masterclasses taking place in March 2024. To book a place, please click here.