- About us
- About colleges
-
Corporate services
- Corporate services
- Mental health and wellbeing
- Data Protection/GDPR
-
Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment: How we support members
- Introduction & Employment Helpline
- Absence & Sickness Management
- Contracts and T&Cs
- Disciplinary, Capability & Grievance
- Employment Briefings Library
- Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
- General Employee Relations & HR Issues
- Holiday/annual leave related
- Industrial Relations
- ONS reclassification related guidance
- Pay & Pensions
- Recruitment
- Redundancy, Restructuring & TUPE
- Safeguarding/Prevent
- Workforce Benchmarking, Surveys & Research
-
Governance
- Governance
- Governance: How we support members
- Governance Timeline
- Representation
- AoC National Chairs' Council
- National Governance Professionals' Group
- Code of Good Governance
- External Governance Reviews
- Resources
- Governors Inductions
- Student Governor Inductions
- Student Governor Support Hub
- Guidance
- Hot Topics
- Governance Briefings
- Archive
-
Projects
- Projects
- Get Involved!
- Resources
- Contact the Projects Team
- Apprenticeship Workforce Development (AWD) Programme
- Creating a Greener London – Sustainable Construction Skills
- The 5Rs Approach to GCSE Maths Resits
- Creative Arts in FE 2024 – developing student voice through creativity
- DfE Multiply Capability Support Programme
- Digital Roles Across Non-digital Industries
- GCSE Resits Hub Project
- Pears Foundation Youth Social Action Programme: Phase 2
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Provider Support Programme
- T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Offer
- The Valuing Enrichment Project
- Creative Writing in FE Anthology 2021/2022
- Resources/Guidance
- Sustainability & Climate Action Hub
- Partnerships
- Honours Nomination
- Brexit
- Ofsted Inspection Support
- Recruitment and consultancy
-
Events and training
- Events and training
- Events
- AoC Annual Conference and Exhibition 2024
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Events
- Events and training: How we support members
- Network Meetings
- Previous Events and Webinars
- In-House Training
- Senior Leadership Development Programme
- Introducing AoC's Early Career and Experienced Managers' Programme
- Sponsorship and Exhibition Opportunities
- Funding and finance
-
Policy
- Policy
- Meet the Policy Team
- Policy: How we support members
- Policy Areas
- Policy Briefings
- Submissions
- Policy Papers & Reports
- AoC Strategy Groups
-
AoC Reference Groups
- AoC Reference Groups
- 14-16 Reference Group
- 16-18 Reference Group
- Adults (inc. ESOL) Reference Group
- Apprenticeship Reference Group
- EDI Reference Group
- HE Reference Group
- HR Reference Group
- International Reference Group
- Mental Health Reference Group
- SEND Reference Group
- Sustainability & Climate Change Reference Group
- Technology Reference Group
- WorldSkills Reference Group
- Opportunity England
-
Research unit
- Research unit
- Surveys
- MiDES Benchmarking
- Research Further
-
Research projects
- Research projects
- Investigating the impact of the apprenticeship levy on training outcomes - January 2024
- Forecasting the cost of the English HE funding system - November 2023
- Local skills improvement plans: a review of their impact and opportunities for the future
- The educational provision for 14 to 16-year-olds in further education in England
- Staying with the troublemakers: A celebration of research in FE
- Strengthening governance arrangements in the English post-16 skills system
- Data Sources
- Think Further - thought leadership in FE
-
News, campaigns and parliament
- News, campaigns and parliament
- Post-election hub
- General and mayoral election resources
-
Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Media relations: 10 ways to build effective relationships with the media
- How to choose a PR agency
- Legal considerations for communications and media work
- How to plan for a new build
- Crisis communications: your go-to guide
- How to handle photo consent for media and marketing
- How to evaluate a PR and media campaign
- How to react to regulation, funding and restructuring issues
- How to react quickly and effectively to the media
- Working with the media: a complete guide
- How to write a compelling case study
- How to write for the web
- College communications, marketing and campaigns community
- AoC Newsroom
- AoC Blogs
- Work in Parliament
- AoC Campaigns
- Briefings
- Communications, media, marketing and research: How we support members
-
Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion blogs
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter for further education sector organisations
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter signatories
- Diversity in Leadership
- Black FE Leadership Group and AoC partnership agreement
- AoC's Equity Exchange
- Equality, diversity and inclusion: how we support members
- Equality, diversity and inclusion case studies
- ETF Inclusive Leadership Coaching Programme
- Equality, diversity and inclusion briefings
- Home
- News, campaigns and parliament
- AoC Blogs
- How much is a moral argument worth?
How much is a moral argument worth?
I don’t envy the Chancellor in the weeks leading up his Budget speech on 22nd November. I’ve experienced what it is like from a Departmental perspective in the run-up to a Budget: enormous efforts to construct arguments, collate and present evidence; work with Ministers to understand the politics (whilst staying politically neutral); and, the fraught relationships between Department and Treasury officials. It’s a multi-lateral negotiation process which is immensely complex and it usually goes to the wire.
In fact the last Budget – March of this year – was very unusual because Treasury told me about the additional £500m investment in T Levels 5 days before it was announced. Whilst I will definitely have my phone on this year, I am pretty certain that normal practice will prevail this year and I’ll be hoping for some positive news to come out of the hat as a big surprise. But not expecting.
The Chancellor has some big challenges to face up to across Government. Within the education world, schools will still be making the case for more funding, with a strong political lobby backed up by parents. Universities will also be fighting hard to secure their income (more than they have really had to for a long while), whilst the election has shown how important it is for all parties to court young people and in particular university students. All have merit and I am sure that all will be considered carefully.
For colleges, we always have to fight that bit harder – we don’t have the same powerful advocates nor the political clout of HE and schools. We have not built up the political capital to make the impact I would like us to have. One of my ambitions is for AoC to take a leadership role in building a much stronger and vocal group of advocates for what colleges do. The voice of employers and students need to be mobilised more if we are to really be listened to, and we need to act collectively and with energy much more than we do now. That, though, will not be developed enough for this year, so we have been active in making the case directly and through backbench MPs, working with the schools sector which faces the same funding challenges for 16-19 year-olds.
The enormous shame of this is that it is college students and employers who are missing out - their life chances and their successes are being hampered by the lack of fair and full investment.
Take young people – in their GCSE year the basic funding for teaching and support is set to rise to £4,800 per year. For completely inexplicable reasons, the following year it drops to £4,000 which pales against the funding invested in young people in all of our competitor nations. This results in only 14 – 15 hours a week of teaching and support, compared with 28-30 in many countries.
We have argued for an immediate £200 per student more each year at a total cost of around £200m. I can imagine Treasury officials will be calculating the economic return on this potential investment and the politicians will do the same but with the added perspective of political return as well as economic. Sadly, the results of those calculations, in the short term, probably look less compelling than other areas of public policy – just try to weigh up the political return of investment in housing, care, NHS, tax breaks or transport against more hours to support for young people.
On the economic return on investment, participation numbers and results for young people look ok overall so that’s no burning platform. But this is where the moral argument and the longer term ambition come in. A Government truly committed to ‘a country that works for everyone’ will be taking a long and serious look at how young people are supported in the difficult transition from childhood and full-time education into working life. Any review would question why we seem to believe that our young people can cope with around half the hours of support compared with other similar countries.
It’s not so much of a problem for young people from better-off households, with strong social capital within their family and friends; it bites much more for those from households with lower educational achievement, with fewer helpful networks, with less money to spend on tutors and ‘leisure enrichment’ (travel, museums etc). It works even less well for young people who have no family support; for this group, colleges become the lifeline and often the last chance for successfully navigating into working life. And here’s the rub – the funding cuts bite most for these young people, because colleges have less resource to provide support, both in terms of staff time and bursary money.
So, I’m hoping that the Chancellor gets to see the evidence we have provided and can understand the moral issues. Even better if he can appreciate that investing in this critical phase of life will pay dividends in the long term for our society and for our economy. We’ll keep on making the case because this matters so much for the young people who lack the voice and who need advocates for their interests. I just hope that the moral and long term arguments can out-weigh the short term and political imperatives. We will find out on the 22nd November.