- About us
- About colleges
-
Corporate services
- Corporate services
- Mental health and wellbeing
- Data Protection/GDPR
-
Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment: How we support members
- Introduction & Employment Helpline
- Absence & Sickness Management
- Contracts and T&Cs
- Disciplinary, Capability, Grievance & Harassment
- Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
- General Employee Relations & HR Issues
- Holiday/annual leave related
- Industrial Relations
- ONS reclassification related guidance
- Pay & Pensions
- Recruitment
- Redundancy, Restructuring & TUPE
- Safeguarding/Prevent
- Workforce Benchmarking, Surveys & Research
-
Governance
- Governance
- Governance: How we support members
- Governance Timeline
- Representation
- AoC National Chairs' Council
- National Governance Professionals' Group
- Code of Good Governance
- External Board Reviews
- Resources
- Governors Inductions
- Student Governor Inductions
- Student Governor Support Hub
- Guidance
- Hot Topics
- Governance Briefings
- Archive
-
Projects
- Projects
- Get Involved!
- Resources
- Contact the Projects Team
- Apprenticeship Workforce Development (AWD) Programme
- Creating a Greener London – Sustainable Construction Skills
- The 5Rs Approach to GCSE Maths Resits
- Creative Arts in FE 2024 – developing student voice through creativity
- DfE Multiply Capability Support Programme
- Digital Roles Across Non-digital Industries
- GCSE Resits Hub Project
- Pears Foundation Youth Social Action Programme: Phase 2
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Provider Support Programme
- T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Offer
- The Valuing Enrichment Project
- Film London - Metro London Skills Cluster
- Resources/Guidance
- Sustainability & Climate Action Hub
- Partnerships
- Honours Nomination
- Brexit
- Ofsted Inspection Support
- Recruitment and consultancy
-
Events and training
- Events and training
- Events
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Events
- Events and training: How we support members
- Network Meetings
- Previous Events and Webinars
- In-House Training
- Senior Leadership Development Programme
- Early Career and Experienced Managers' Programme
- Sponsorship and Exhibition Opportunities
- Funding and finance
-
Policy
- Policy
- Meet the Policy Team
- Policy: How we support members
- Policy Areas
- Policy Briefings
- Submissions
- Policy Papers & Reports
- AoC Strategy Groups
-
AoC Reference Groups
- AoC Reference Groups
- 14-16 Reference Group
- 16-18 Reference Group
- Adults (inc. ESOL) Reference Group
- Apprenticeship Reference Group
- EDI Reference Group
- HE Reference Group
- HR Reference Group
- International Reference Group
- Mental Health Reference Group
- SEND Reference Group
- Sustainability & Climate Change Reference Group
- Technology Reference Group
- WorldSkills Reference Group
- Opportunity England
- Research unit
-
News, campaigns and parliament
- News, campaigns and parliament
- Post-election hub
- General and mayoral election resources
-
Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Media relations: 10 ways to build effective relationships with the media
- How to choose a PR agency
- Legal considerations for communications and media work
- How to plan for a new build
- Crisis communications: your go-to guide
- How to handle photo consent for media and marketing
- How to evaluate a PR and media campaign
- How to react to regulation, funding and restructuring issues
- How to react quickly and effectively to the media
- Working with the media: a complete guide
- How to write a compelling case study
- How to write for the web
- Communications, marketing and campaigns community
- AoC Newsroom
- AoC Blogs
- Work in Parliament
- AoC Campaigns
- Briefings
- Communications, media, marketing and research: How we support members
-
Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion blogs
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter for further education sector organisations
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter signatories
- Diversity in Leadership
- Black FE Leadership Group and AoC partnership agreement
- AoC's Equity Exchange
- Equality, diversity and inclusion: how we support members
- Equality, diversity and inclusion case studies
- ETF Inclusive Leadership Coaching Programme
- Equality, diversity and inclusion briefings
- Home
- News, campaigns and parliament
- AoC Newsroom
- Student report: Open University trains markers to spot generative AI work
Student report: Open University trains markers to spot generative AI work
The Open University has carried out research into the strengths and weaknesses of assessment types as generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools develop.
AI is becoming more present in both education and workspaces, with more than half (56%) of college students using a form of GAI on their coursework or essays, according to the Open University. This, the university, suggested could cause an increase in plagarised work.
The Open University conducted 55 different assessments to discover which are the most robust, and easiest assessment types for learners to answer if they use GAI. As part of the research, markers were given 16 answers, ten of which were authentic answers and six of which were GAI generated. The scripts were split up to prevent the markers from knowing who wrote which answer. A total of 950 answers were included in the research, making it the largest GAI investigation at the time.
Liz Hardie, Director of SCiLAB and Senior Lecturer in Open Justice, said that the markers had a positive reaction to the training, with many feeling more confident in pointing out where GAI has been used. Hardie said that training markers to recognise GAI can be extremely beneficial, however it could also lead to some students being falsely accused of using the tools. Studies by The Open University have shown how work produced by GAI is similar to some lower ability students work.
An anonymous marker said: "I could see how the ways in which GAI cannot really come to a conclusion is different from the ways in which students just fail to put forward an argument. GAI tends to provide both sides of an argument and then it’s not coming to a conclusion, while students just fail to put forward a convincing argument throughout.”
The investigation concluded that the higher the level of qualification, the less useful GAI technology is. The study found that GAI allowed Level 3 learners to achieve higher grades than those at Level 5, which suggests that the tools are more useful for college students rather than university students.
It’s hoped that the project will help markers to be able to pinpoint when a learner has used AI and ultimately reduce the amount of plagiarism that is taking place within schools and colleges.
Charlie Wheeler is studying UAL creative media production: Extended Diploma in journalism at Exeter College. He was reporting from the Association of Colleges Annual Conference and Exhibition.