- About us
- About colleges
-
Corporate services
- Corporate services
- Mental health and wellbeing
- Data Protection/GDPR
-
Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment: How we support members
- Introduction & Employment Helpline
- Absence & Sickness Management
- Contracts and T&Cs
- Disciplinary, Capability, Grievance & Harassment
- Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
- General Employee Relations & HR Issues
- Holiday/annual leave related
- Industrial Relations
- ONS reclassification related guidance
- Pay & Pensions
- Recruitment
- Redundancy, Restructuring & TUPE
- Safeguarding/Prevent
- Workforce Benchmarking, Surveys & Research
-
Governance
- Governance
- Governance: How we support members
- Governance Timeline
- Representation
- AoC National Chairs' Council
- National Governance Professionals' Group
- Code of Good Governance
- External Board Reviews
- Resources
- Governors Inductions
- Student Governor Inductions
- Student Governor Support Hub
- Guidance
- Hot Topics
- Governance Briefings
- Archive
-
Projects
- Projects
- Get Involved!
- Resources
- Contact the Projects Team
- Apprenticeship Workforce Development (AWD) Programme
- Creating a Greener London – Sustainable Construction Skills
- The 5Rs Approach to GCSE Maths Resits
- Creative Arts in FE 2024 – developing student voice through creativity
- DfE Multiply Capability Support Programme
- Digital Roles Across Non-digital Industries
- GCSE Resits Hub Project
- Pears Foundation Youth Social Action Programme: Phase 2
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Provider Support Programme
- T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Offer
- The Valuing Enrichment Project
- Film London - Metro London Skills Cluster
- Resources/Guidance
- Sustainability & Climate Action Hub
- Partnerships
- Honours Nomination
- Brexit
- Ofsted Inspection Support
- Recruitment and consultancy
-
Events and training
- Events and training
- Events
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Events
- Events and training: How we support members
- Network Meetings
- Previous Events and Webinars
- In-House Training
- Senior Leadership Development Programme
- Early Career and Experienced Managers' Programme
- Sponsorship and Exhibition Opportunities
- Funding and finance
-
Policy
- Policy
- Meet the Policy Team
- Policy: How we support members
- Policy Areas
- Policy Briefings
- Submissions
- Policy Papers & Reports
- AoC Strategy Groups
-
AoC Reference Groups
- AoC Reference Groups
- 14-16 Reference Group
- 16-18 Reference Group
- Adults (inc. ESOL) Reference Group
- Apprenticeship Reference Group
- EDI Reference Group
- HE Reference Group
- HR Reference Group
- International Reference Group
- Mental Health Reference Group
- SEND Reference Group
- Sustainability & Climate Change Reference Group
- Technology Reference Group
- WorldSkills Reference Group
- Opportunity England
- Research unit
-
News, campaigns and parliament
- News, campaigns and parliament
- Post-election hub
- General and mayoral election resources
-
Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Media relations: 10 ways to build effective relationships with the media
- How to choose a PR agency
- Legal considerations for communications and media work
- How to plan for a new build
- Crisis communications: your go-to guide
- How to handle photo consent for media and marketing
- How to evaluate a PR and media campaign
- How to react to regulation, funding and restructuring issues
- How to react quickly and effectively to the media
- Working with the media: a complete guide
- How to write a compelling case study
- How to write for the web
- Communications, marketing and campaigns community
- AoC Newsroom
- AoC Blogs
- Work in Parliament
- AoC Campaigns
- Briefings
- Communications, media, marketing and research: How we support members
-
Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion blogs
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter for further education sector organisations
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter signatories
- Diversity in Leadership
- Black FE Leadership Group and AoC partnership agreement
- AoC's Equity Exchange
- Equality, diversity and inclusion: how we support members
- Equality, diversity and inclusion case studies
- ETF Inclusive Leadership Coaching Programme
- Equality, diversity and inclusion briefings
- Home
- News, campaigns and parliament
- AoC Newsroom
- Office for students fees - why colleges pay 26% of the costs of the new regulator
Office for students fees - why colleges pay 26% of the costs of the new regulator
The Office for Students (OfS) will be charging fees in 2019 to the universities and colleges that it regulates. Surprisingly, the fees charged to colleges will cover more than 25% of the total despite the fact that fewer than 10% of HE students are in colleges. A number of colleges have queried their OfS subscription invoices. Here is a summary of the position:
The policy
It is fairly standard practice (a Treasury policy) for regulators to recover their costs from those they regulate. The government secured legal powers to charge 2019-20 fees in the 2017 legislation and in a 2019 statutory instrument. Paying the fee is a condition of OfS registration.
The decision to introduce fees saves the government £26 million in 2019-20
The data
OfS recently published data (2017-8 student data (FTEs) which they use to set subscription fees. Based on this data we have prepared this spreadsheet:
OfS fee estimate 15.7.19.xlsx
OfS fee estimate 15.7.19.xlsx (XLSX,49.93 KB)
Which have used it to calculate that:
Colleges will pay £6.5 million in 2019-20. This is an average £39,900 bill for the 164 colleges and is a £74 charge per FTE student
Universities and higher education institutions will pay £16.8 million. This is an average £128,300 bill for the 131 institution but just £10 per FTE
Alternative providers will pay £2.6 million. This is an average £36,100 bill for the 71 college and a £66 charge per FTE student
Three reasons why colleges are paying so much more per student
The Department for Education consulted twice about its subscription method (in 2016 and 2017) but introduced a fairly late decision in 2019 relating to Level 4 and 5 students. Taking everything together there are three main reasons why colleges are paying more per student:
The subscription bandings used by OfS mean that institutions with larger student numbers pay less per FTE than smaller institution. There is an exemption for new providers ("challenger institutions") but not for colleges
Level 4 and 5 students (on non-prescribed courses regulated by ESFA and Ofsted) are included in the count
The policy to include students that OfS doesn't fund (including international students) makes no difference to universities because subscription bandings are very wide at the highest level
Overall fees are also higher than originally promised. The impact assessment published in 2017 predicted there would be 495 providers paying fees whereas there are currently less than 380 providers on the published register (with a few more waiting for decisions on their applications).
The financial impact (and why this matters)
The university sector in England has its financial challenges but the sector's surplus exceeds £1 billion a year in most years. OfS subscriptions of £100,000 to £150,000 are a major irritant for universities but they have multi-million pound operating cashflows . The position is more serious for colleges who have wafer thin margins and who have found out very late that they have bills of £40,000 or more. OfS was slow to add some colleges to the register so the size of the bill hasn't become apparent until late in their budget-setting process.
There is a risk that some colleges will decide - for financial reasons - that they should withdraw their OfS registration to avoid these fees. Individual colleges can do this by transferring all of their courses to a university partner. If this happens, then the college will both be vulnerable to changes in policy (for example from a new vice-chancellor) and might miss out on opportunities to expand higher technical courses for the benefit of their students, employers and communities.