- About us
- About colleges
-
Corporate services
- Corporate services
- Mental health and wellbeing
- Data Protection/GDPR
-
Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment: How we support members
- Introduction & Employment Helpline
- Absence & Sickness Management
- Contracts and T&Cs
- Disciplinary, Capability, Grievance & Harassment
- Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
- General Employee Relations & HR Issues
- Holiday/annual leave related
- Industrial Relations
- ONS reclassification related guidance
- Pay & Pensions
- Recruitment
- Redundancy, Restructuring & TUPE
- Safeguarding/Prevent
- Workforce Benchmarking, Surveys & Research
-
Governance
- Governance
- Governance: How we support members
- Governance Timeline
- Representation
- AoC National Chairs' Council
- National Governance Professionals' Group
- Code of Good Governance
- External Board Reviews
- Resources
- Governors Inductions
- Student Governor Inductions
- Student Governor Support Hub
- Guidance
- Hot Topics
- Governance Briefings
- Archive
-
Projects
- Projects
- Get Involved!
- Resources
- Contact the Projects Team
- Apprenticeship Workforce Development (AWD) Programme
- Creating a Greener London – Sustainable Construction Skills
- The 5Rs Approach to GCSE Maths Resits
- Creative Arts in FE 2024 – developing student voice through creativity
- DfE Multiply Capability Support Programme
- Digital Roles Across Non-digital Industries
- GCSE Resits Hub Project
- Pears Foundation Youth Social Action Programme: Phase 2
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Provider Support Programme
- T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Offer
- The Valuing Enrichment Project
- Film London - Metro London Skills Cluster
- Resources/Guidance
- Sustainability & Climate Action Hub
- Partnerships
- Honours Nomination
- Brexit
- Ofsted Inspection Support
- Recruitment and consultancy
-
Events and training
- Events and training
- Events
- AoC Annual Conference and Exhibition 2024
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Events
- Events and training: How we support members
- Network Meetings
- Previous Events and Webinars
- In-House Training
- Senior Leadership Development Programme
- Early Career and Experienced Managers' Programme
- Sponsorship and Exhibition Opportunities
- Funding and finance
-
Policy
- Policy
- Meet the Policy Team
- Policy: How we support members
- Policy Areas
- Policy Briefings
- Submissions
- Policy Papers & Reports
- AoC Strategy Groups
-
AoC Reference Groups
- AoC Reference Groups
- 14-16 Reference Group
- 16-18 Reference Group
- Adults (inc. ESOL) Reference Group
- Apprenticeship Reference Group
- EDI Reference Group
- HE Reference Group
- HR Reference Group
- International Reference Group
- Mental Health Reference Group
- SEND Reference Group
- Sustainability & Climate Change Reference Group
- Technology Reference Group
- WorldSkills Reference Group
- Opportunity England
- Research unit
-
News, campaigns and parliament
- News, campaigns and parliament
-
Mission accepted
- Mission accepted
- Mission accepted: case studies
- Mission one: kickstart economic growth
- Mission two: make Britain a clean energy superpower
- Mission three: take back our streets
- Mission four: breaking down barriers to opportunity
- Mission five: build an NHS fit for the future
- Mission accepted resources
- Post-election hub
- General and mayoral election resources
-
Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Media relations: 10 ways to build effective relationships with the media
- How to choose a PR agency
- Legal considerations for communications and media work
- How to plan for a new build
- Crisis communications: your go-to guide
- How to handle photo consent for media and marketing
- How to evaluate a PR and media campaign
- How to react to regulation, funding and restructuring issues
- How to react quickly and effectively to the media
- Working with the media: a complete guide
- How to write a compelling case study
- How to write for the web
- Communications, marketing and campaigns community
- AoC Newsroom
- AoC Blogs
- College case studies
- Work in Parliament
- AoC Campaigns
- Briefings
- Communications, media, marketing and research: How we support members
-
Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion blogs
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter for further education sector organisations
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter signatories
- Diversity in Leadership
- Black FE Leadership Group and AoC partnership agreement
- AoC's Equity Exchange
- Equality, diversity and inclusion: how we support members
- Equality, diversity and inclusion case studies
- ETF Inclusive Leadership Coaching Programme
- Equality, diversity and inclusion briefings
- Home
- News, campaigns and parliament
- AoC Newsroom
- FE and skills must be reformed to meet the economic and social needs of the nation, says AoC
FE and skills must be reformed to meet the economic and social needs of the nation, says AoC
The future government must reform the apprenticeship levy, introduce a young person’s guarantee to education and training, and establish a national social partnership body, the Association of Colleges has said.
In a seminal report, 100% opportunity: the case for a tertiary education system, ahead of mayoral and general elections this year, AoC says that England’s post-16 education system needs urgent reform if it is to meet the needs of 100% of young people and adults.
Currently, there is a set of siloed and fragmented education policies, with some good features, but without any clear strategy and priorities. Despite this, colleges across the country still manage to deliver great outcomes. However, they could do so much more with a better system.
The changes set out by AoC would empower colleges to fulfil their role in boosting our economy and society, by ensuring equitable access to education and improved outcomes for individuals and employers alike.
In the report, new analysis from London Economics is brought together with AoC’s expert insight to conclude that the existing system is ineffective, inefficient and unfair despite having strength in parts.
It’s ineffective because even with sustainable public investment and the collective effort of those working in post-16 education, the system fails to deliver the outcomes needed by society and the economy, with too many people not achieving Level 3 by the age of 19, skills shortages increasing and stalling economic growth.
It’s inefficient because a very high proportion of government funds supports young people to complete higher education (HE), with far too little funding going to those who need to access further education and apprenticeships, and those adults who want to re-train or upskill.
It’s unfair because the fact remains that the household and place you grow up in has a major impact on your chances of progressing and achieving in our education system. Socioeconomic class is a major driver of success for the most advantaged and lack of progress for those from poorer households and places.
Research from London Economics, and commissioned by AoC, found that based on current trends, the net annual cost of higher education funding will be £3.14 billion in 2030/31, adding real pressure on HM Treasury and Department of Education budgets, and therefore putting at risk the funding across the rest of the education system.
Research also found that since the introduction of the apprenticeship levy, there have been fewer apprentices, a big drop in young apprentices (aged under 25) and narrowing of access with the proportion of starters from deprived areas decreasing and least deprived areas increasing, all while the average cost of an apprenticeship has doubled.
What a system that serves everyone would look like
-
A national social partnership body, working across the government to support strategies like the green transition plan, NHS long term workforce plan, industrial strategy, digital transition and inward investment plans, and set priorities for the whole country.
-
An effective system of devolution, establishing local skills improvement plans (LSIPs) which are aligned to national priorities and set out how the locality can deliver on them as well as the local economic growth priorities.
-
A young person’s guarantee and demand-led adult funding, guaranteeing every 16-year-old a minimum offer they can access and providing adult funding so everyone can access the learning and skills they need.
-
Mission clarity of schools, colleges, universities, encouraging them to collaborate and signup to the new system, ensuring there is a complete ‘offer’ for every 16-year-old and bringing together the adult education budget (AEB), apprenticeships, Higher Technical Qualifications (HTQs) and degree education for adults.
-
Curriculum and qualifications that reflect national and local needs, through a national review centred around more hours for 16 to 18-year-olds, a broader curriculum, stronger enrichment and more inclusion and urgently reconsidering English and maths GCSEs and the resit policy.
-
A reformed apprenticeship levy, top-slicing the levy to fund national and local priorities.
David Hughes, chief executive of Association of Colleges, said: “Our report is an urgent call to action for both the government and the Labour party. We desperately need an effective, efficient and fair tertiary system, and the recommendations we set out would achieve that by putting colleges at the heart of the reform.
“Colleges are in the unique position of playing a significant part across all areas of post-16 education and skills, and in all areas of the country.
“With the changes we propose they will be able to motivate, engage and support far more 14 to 16-year-olds, young people and adults, and support more employers. As anchor institutions in a tertiary system they would be able to work with schools and universities to offer a broader, more coherent place-based offer to young people, adults and employers – and therefore help the economy and society as a whole.”
Pietro Patrignani, Principal Consultant at London Economics, who led the study, said: "Apprenticeship starts in England in 2022/23 were 160,000 lower than those observed before the introduction of the Apprenticeship Levy in April 2017. This decline is particularly alarming as it disproportionately impacts those most in need of training, in particular younger people and those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Over time there has been a notable shift of apprenticeship funding towards higher-level apprenticeships, leading to a significant decrease in training opportunities at lower levels."
Alice Battiston, a Senior Economic Consultant and co-author of the study, said: "In addition, northern regions with traditionally high levels of apprenticeship intensity and SMEs have been particularly affected. It is now time to think how the system may be reformed and improved to provide a wider range of training opportunities”
Maike Halterbeck, a Divisional Director at London Economics and author of the study, said “The recent reforms to student loan repayment terms implemented in response to the Augar Review are expected to result in a large decline in the net Exchequer cost of the English higher education funding system. However, in spite of these reforms, the costs of the system continue to apply significant pressures on the public finances – particularly in the context of a demographic boom in the number of 16 to 18-year-olds.”
“A lot of the debate has focused on the current costs of the system. However, the surge in expected costs going forward as a result of rising student numbers will need to be addressed urgently.”
The full report can be accessed here.