- About us
- About colleges
-
Corporate services
- Corporate services
- Mental health and wellbeing
- Data Protection/GDPR
-
Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment Services - college workforce
- Employment: How we support members
- Introduction & Employment Helpline
- Absence & Sickness Management
- Contracts and T&Cs
- Disciplinary, Capability, Grievance & Harassment
- Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
- General Employee Relations & HR Issues
- Holiday/annual leave related
- Industrial Relations
- ONS reclassification related guidance
- Pay & Pensions
- Recruitment
- Redundancy, Restructuring & TUPE
- Safeguarding/Prevent
- Workforce Benchmarking, Surveys & Research
-
Governance
- Governance
- Governance: How we support members
- Governance Timeline
- Representation
- AoC National Chairs' Council
- National Governance Professionals' Group
- Code of Good Governance
- External Board Reviews
- Resources
- Governors Inductions
- Student Governor Inductions
- Student Governor Support Hub
- Guidance
- Hot Topics
- Governance Briefings
- Archive
-
Projects
- Projects
- Get Involved!
- Resources
- Contact the Projects Team
- Apprenticeship Workforce Development (AWD) Programme
- Creating a Greener London – Sustainable Construction Skills
- The 5Rs Approach to GCSE Maths Resits
- Creative Arts in FE 2024 – developing student voice through creativity
- DfE Multiply Capability Support Programme
- Digital Roles Across Non-digital Industries
- GCSE Resits Hub Project
- Pears Foundation Youth Social Action Programme: Phase 2
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Provider Support Programme
- T Level Professional Development (TLPD) Offer
- The Valuing Enrichment Project
- Film London - Metro London Skills Cluster
- Resources/Guidance
- Sustainability & Climate Action Hub
- Partnerships
- Honours Nomination
- Brexit
- Ofsted Inspection Support
- Recruitment and consultancy
-
Events and training
- Events and training
- Events
- AoC Annual Conference and Exhibition 2024
- T Level and T Level Foundation Year Events
- Events and training: How we support members
- Network Meetings
- Previous Events and Webinars
- In-House Training
- Senior Leadership Development Programme
- Early Career and Experienced Managers' Programme
- Sponsorship and Exhibition Opportunities
- Funding and finance
-
Policy
- Policy
- Meet the Policy Team
- Policy: How we support members
- Policy Areas
- Policy Briefings
- Submissions
- Policy Papers & Reports
- AoC Strategy Groups
-
AoC Reference Groups
- AoC Reference Groups
- 14-16 Reference Group
- 16-18 Reference Group
- Adults (inc. ESOL) Reference Group
- Apprenticeship Reference Group
- EDI Reference Group
- HE Reference Group
- HR Reference Group
- International Reference Group
- Mental Health Reference Group
- SEND Reference Group
- Sustainability & Climate Change Reference Group
- Technology Reference Group
- WorldSkills Reference Group
- Opportunity England
- Research unit
-
News, campaigns and parliament
- News, campaigns and parliament
-
Mission accepted
- Mission accepted
- Mission accepted: case studies
- Mission one: kickstart economic growth
- Mission two: make Britain a clean energy superpower
- Mission three: take back our streets
- Mission four: breaking down barriers to opportunity
- Mission five: build an NHS fit for the future
- Mission accepted resources
- Post-election hub
- General and mayoral election resources
-
Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Comms advice and resources for colleges
- Media relations: 10 ways to build effective relationships with the media
- How to choose a PR agency
- Legal considerations for communications and media work
- How to plan for a new build
- Crisis communications: your go-to guide
- How to handle photo consent for media and marketing
- How to evaluate a PR and media campaign
- How to react to regulation, funding and restructuring issues
- How to react quickly and effectively to the media
- Working with the media: a complete guide
- How to write a compelling case study
- How to write for the web
- Communications, marketing and campaigns community
- AoC Newsroom
- AoC Blogs
- College case studies
- Work in Parliament
- AoC Campaigns
- Briefings
- Communications, media, marketing and research: How we support members
-
Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion
- Equality, diversity and inclusion blogs
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter for further education sector organisations
- AoC’s Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Charter signatories
- Diversity in Leadership
- Black FE Leadership Group and AoC partnership agreement
- AoC's Equity Exchange
- Equality, diversity and inclusion: how we support members
- Equality, diversity and inclusion case studies
- ETF Inclusive Leadership Coaching Programme
- Equality, diversity and inclusion briefings
- Home
- News, campaigns and parliament
- AoC Newsroom
- AoC responds to Ofqual consultation on grading A Levels and GCSEs
AoC responds to Ofqual consultation on grading A Levels and GCSEs
AoC has today responded to the Ofqual consultation on the exceptional arrangements for grading A Levels and GCSEs this summer. These flow from the government’s decision to cancel exams and ensure that GCSE and A Level candidates are provided with calculated grades this summer. AoC is working with Ofqual and Awarding Organisations to ensure that college students are not disadvantaged. AoC is now considering Ofqual’s proposals for Functional Skills, vocational and technical qualifications which so many college students depend on. Chief Executive, David Hughes commented:
“Since the cancellation of this summer’s exams, Ofqual has worked amazingly quickly to develop these proposed arrangements – they make sense and are based on sound principles. I particularly welcome the level of trust being shown in teachers and colleges and I am confident that the process will be taken seriously and produce valid grades. We do have some specific concerns about the operation of the process for colleges and we are seeking reassurance on some points.”
Among the main concerns for colleges are: Ranking for large cohorts: We understand the need for ranking, but colleges are concerned about the requirement for centres with very large subject entries to provide a single centre ranking for all their candidate grades. We do not think this extra work is necessary or that it provides any additional accuracy so we are suggesting that it should be possible to submit rankings in batches of 150. For GCSE retake candidates, the results are very ‘bunched’ around grade 3 and 4 so it should be possible for candidates to share the same ranking position.
The statistical standardisation process: The starting point should be that the Centre Assessed Grades and rankings submitted are seen as accurate and then to agree the relative importance given to the 3 sources of evidence within the statistical standardisation process.The 16-18 GCSE English and maths cohort will need a different basis for statistical adjustment as it is not a full age-cohort. This also applies to adult GCSE candidates and college based 14-16 year olds. It will be important to be clear how any statistical adjustment has been applied to these cohorts.
Predicting centre trajectories: It is not possible to predict centre trajectories into the future, as trends in results (whether up or down) cannot be assumed to continue. The post-16 GCSE English and maths cohort is even harder to predict as it can vary from year to year and will be affected by college entry policies. Colleges who feel that their results were going to substantially change will want to reflect that in their centre assessed grades. For example, there are many colleges which will be predicting strong improvements in GCSE maths achievement as a result of major interventions as part of their involvement with Centres for Excellence in Maths or the 5Rs project, so centre results profiles should not necessarily be linked to past achievements.
Equalities impact: The equalities impacts of these arrangements are crucially important. If there is any clear research evidence of systemic under-prediction for specific groups of students this should be corrected for at the national level and be reported on.
You can read the full response here.